Apathy in the Face of Evil

Blood Meridian is a hard book to recommend to people. It is brilliant and unforgettable. It is violent and gruesome.

Those things are not separable.

It’s a post-Civil War tale of The Kid (never named) as he joins a marauding band of scalp hunters in the borderlands between Mexico and what will eventually become part of the United States. Led by John Glanton, this gang commits atrocities everywhere it goes while it hunts down assorted bands of Apaches and Comanches committing comparable atrocities wherever they go.

One lesson: if you are in charge of a small town in this country and you decide to hire Glanton to rid you of the threat of a murderous tribe threatening to rampage through your town, just know that the cure is as bad as the disease. But, that lesson doesn’t have a lot of relevance to you, Dear Reader.

Instead, let us turn to Judge Holden, who summarizes the fundamental message of the book thus:

If God meant to interfere in the degeneracy of mankind would he not have done so by now? Wolves cull themselves, man. What other creature could? And is the race of man not more predacious yet? The way of the world is to bloom and to flower and die but in the affairs of men there is no waning and the noon of his expression signals the onset of night. His spirit is exhausted at the peak of its achievement. His meridian is it once his darkening and the evening of his day. He loves games? Let him play for stakes.

Judge Holden celebrates the degeneracy of man. He is, after all, the devil.

Holden is without a doubt one of the most terrifying villains in literature. Larger than life, he rides with Glanton’s gang as they move from atrocity to atrocity. All the while, he offers a commentary on the world, recording every thing he finds in his leather notebook right before destroying those things.

Why keep this record of things he will destroy? “Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent….In order for it to be mine nothing must be permitted to occur upon it save by my dispensation.”

Toadvine sat with his boots crossed before the fire. No man can acquaint himself with everything on his earth, he said.
The judge tilted his great head. The man who believes that the secrets of the world are forever hidden lives in mystery and fear. Superstition will drag him down. The rain will erode the deeds of his life. But that man who sets himself the task of singling out the thread of order from the tapestry will by the decision alone have taken charge of the world and it is only by such taking charge that he will effect a way to dictate the terms of his own fate.
I don’t see what that has to do with catchin birds.
The freedom of birds is an insult to me. I’d have them all in zoos.
That would be a hell of a zoo.
The judge smiled. Yes, he said. Even so.

From the beginning until the end, the Judge hovers over the book, finding that thread of order by destroying everything around it. The Judge is the ruler of this world. Do you doubt it? Recall: Satan offered the world to Christ, but Christ turned down the offer.

You read Blood Meridian and you know you would never want to meet the Judge face-to-face. You close the book in a bit of relief that he is just fictional. Except he isn’t fictional at all. Blood Meridian is a work of fiction, but it is, as they say in Hollywood, based on a true story.

The source is Samuel E Chamberlain’s autobiography, My Confession. Chamberlain tells of joining a marauding gang of scalp hunters led by John Glanton. A surprising number of the horrific events in the novel are right there in this autobiographical tale. You want to think that McCarthy is making this all up, but the violence was very real.

The biggest shock of My Confessions is the second in command in Glanton’s crew is none other than Judge Holden. Chamberlain deftly sketches the nature of Holden in two paragraphs. The only way you could tell that the following two paragraphs are from the true autobiography and not the world of fiction is the difference in style. The description of Holden fits either one.

The second in command, now left in charge of the camp, was a man of gigantic size called “Judge” Holden of Texas. Who or what he was no one knew but a cooler blooded villain never went unhung; he stood six feet six in his moccasins, had a large fleshy frame, a dull tallow colored face destitute of hair and all expression. His desires was blood and women, and terrible stories were circulated in camp of horrid crimes committed by him when bearing another name, in the Cherokee nation and Texas; and before we left Fronteras a little girl of ten years was found in the chapperal, foully violated and murdered. The mark of a huge hand on her little throat pointed him out as the ravisher as no other man had such a hand, but though all suspected, no one charged with the crime.
Holden was by far the best educated man in northern Mexico; he conversed with all in their own language, spoke in several Indian lingos, at a fandango would take the Harp or Guitar from the hands of the musicians and charm all with his wonderful performance, and out-waltz any poblana of the ball. He was “plum centre” with rifle or revolver, a daring horseman, acquainted with the nature of all the strange plants and their botanical names, great in Geology and Mineralogy, in short another Admirable Crichton, and with all an arrant coward. Not but that he possessed enough courage to fight Indians and Mexicans or anywhere he had the advantage and strength, skill and weapons, but where the combat would be equal, he would avoid it if possible. I hated him at first sight, and he knew it, yet nothing could be more gentle and kind than his department towards me; he would often seek conversation with me and speak of Massachusetts and to my astonishment I found he knew more about Boston than I did.

So much for your sigh of relief that Holden is purely a work of fiction.

Holden is evil; there is really no other word for him. He has all the beguiling charm of evil; a perfect example of Milton’s Satan Problem in which the evil character in Paradise Lost is the most fascinating person in the tale of the revolt in Heaven and on earth. When Holden is on the scene, you cannot look away.

What do you do when you face evil? McCarthy’s brilliance as a novelist comes in the fact, that when you read the novel, you know exactly what you do, because McCarthy put you in the novel. You are The Kid.

You don’t think you are The Kid because you haven’t joined a gang of people committing one atrocity after another. After all, you haven’t scalped anyone lately. You just go along with the flow of things, not really doing anything particularly bad. Exactly like The Kid.

A fortune teller with a pack of Tarot Cards entertains Glanton’s Gang one night in the desert. The Judge points the fortune teller in the direction of The Kid, who draws a card. Four of Cups. The novel does not explain the significance of this card, but fortunately we have Google. Four of Cups is the card indicating apathy or disillusionment. You don’t really notice it that much when just reading this story of horrors, but as soon as you step back and isolate the Kid, you realize that Apathy is indeed the right description. Here we have someone surrounded by sadistic evildoers and The Kid just floats along.

The Kid knows what is happening is evil and wrong. He is himself the violent type, but we see throughout the story he has the remnants of a moral code which keep him from going that far, as if he is thinking that as long as he hasn’t actually scalped anyone lately, he isn’t that bad. As the Judge himself says to The Kid, “There’s a flawed place in the fabric of your heart. Do you think I could not know? You alone were mutinous. You alone reserved in your soul some corner of clemency for the heathen.”

In the face of evil, The Kid was apathetic. The Judge again: “For even if you should have stood your ground, he said, yet what ground was it?”

If I had to name one novel from the last 50 years that is the best description of the age in which we live, Blood Meridian is it. Our problem, the problem of our generation, is that we are perfectly happy to isolate wrongdoing in an individual here and there and sometimes we are even willing to say this or that person is evil. But, we do not want to face up to the fact that the degeneracy of man is all around us. We do not like to acknowledge that human depravity is very real and omnipresent. We have no ground on which to stand. And so, we roll with the times, and every now and then we do something that seems a bit kind, like  abandoning a wounded man in the desert rather than shooting him, as a way of convincing ourselves we aren’t that bad.

What if Blood Meridian is right. What if the world in which we live is every bit this bad. What if Judge Holden is real and walks among us. Those aren’t really even questions; you know those things are true. And you, like me and so very many others, draws the Four of Cups and just keep on going.

Destiny and the Coin Flip

“Most people dont believe that there can be such a person. You can see what a problem that must be for them. How to prevail over that which you refuse to acknowledge the existence of.”

No Country for Old Men, Cormac McCarthy

Anton Chigurh is what you, Dear Reader, would call a homicidal psychopath. That is not what he would call himself. The difference between your description and his description reveals much about how you see the world.

(Side note: Chigurh is pronounced something like “sugar.” There is no way to really know how to pronounce it. Anybody who ever asked him is probably no longer among the living.)

The plot of the novel follows the actions of four men near the border of Texas. Llewellyn Moss, mid-30s, married, living in a trailer park, driving a pickup truck. Sheriff Bell, a small town sheriff, the old man of the title. Carson Wells, a rather cocky bounty hunter. And Anton Chigurh, a force of nature. It is Chigurh who interests us here.

Chigurh moves through the novel with an unflappable stoicism. You can imagine him delivering all his lines in a cold and patient monotone. You can imagine him shooting a man with zero hesitancy or doubt or even a twinge of guilt. You can imagine him accomplishing the task in front of him with a cold, almost mechanical precision. Who is this guy, you ask? You’ll never know. He shows up with no backstory. He just is.

At three points in the novel he explains his philosophy to a person who simply cannot comprehend what he is saying. It is hard to believe that such a person can really exist. What type of person is he? You are now thinking he is a cold-blooded psychopath. Maybe you are right. Maybe.

Twice, Chigurh takes a coin out of his pocket, flips it, and demands that the person to whom he is talking call it. He doesn’t explain what happens if you call the coin the right way, but neither the person of whom the demand is made, or you the Reader, have any doubt that calling the coin is a matter of life and death.

At this point, Chigurh sounds a bit like the Batman-villain Two-Face, who leaves his decisions up to chance by flipping a coin. But, that is not at all how Chigurh sees the coin flip.

Put yourself in the position of facing Chigurh. Is he there to kill you? Your immediate reaction is that he is deciding whether to kill you or not. So, you appeal to him. You tell him he does not have to do this; he does not have to kill you. His reply: “Everybody says that.” Everybody imagines that Chigurh is making a choice. So he takes out a coin, flips it, and tells you to call it.

You now think that your life is being decided by the random flip of a coin. But as Chigurh will explain, it isn’t. The coin has been flipped. Nothing you can do or say will change the outcome of the flip. You can appeal to the coin all you want, but whether it is heads or tails will be totally unaffected by your pleas. So, call it. (This is the Reader Participation portion of the essay—call the coin. The result will be revealed shortly. The whole message of this essay depends on you calling the coin flip now. So, do it. After all, what do you have to lose by calling this coin flip?)

Was your fate just decided by how you called the coin after reading the last paragraph? If you called it wrong, will bad things happen? You think the coin has absolutely nothing to do with whether your future is good or bad, whether you live or die. Calling the coin wrong will not cause bad outcomes in your life. Chigurh pulling a trigger is what causes the death. But, this is where Chigurh will explain that your view of the world is wrong. “Look at it my way. I got here the same way the coin did.”

As Chigurh explains, the coin flip does not determine what happens to you. The coin flip merely reveals destiny. You were either going to say the same thing as how the coin came up or you were not. If you are destined to live, then obviously your call and the coin flip will be the same. “It doesn’t have to be that way” makes no sense. What is is what is. Nothing you can say or do will change what is. Nothing you can say or do will change whether the coin was heads or tails. And just as what is is what is, what will be is what will be. You call the coin wrong, then you will die. All Chigurh is doing is acting out what will be. You cannot change the coin. You cannot influence Chigurh. Both are impersonal forces, implacable and unchangeable.

Most people don’t believe that there can be such a person. You can see what a problem that must be for them. How to prevail over that which you refuse to acknowledge the existence of.

Why don’t you believe there can be such a person? Why do you call him a homicidal psychopath? You don’t like the idea that whatever will be will be. You don’t like that idea at all. But what if your preference does not affect what will be. What if no matter how much you plead, the coin will still be what it will be. What if there is a person who is just like that coin? What if the whole universe is just like that coin?

You called the coin above. It was Heads. There is nothing you can do about the fact that you either called it correctly or not. And now you have to live with the consequences. You have no say at all over what consequences will come from whether you called Heads or Tails above. You scoff. You insist that nothing will come if it. You say it is just a silly trick in an essay. Maybe you are right. Maybe. But there is nothing you can do about it, is there?

Child of God

When I am asked to pick one contemporary author whose books are most likely to be called Great Books in a hundred years, the answer is easy.  Cormac McCarthy. 

The best thing about making predictions for 100 years from now, is that there is no chance of having to explain how I could have been so wrong.

Child of God is not McCarthy’s best novel, but it is brilliant in its laser–like precision in asking a question.

The novel is about a social outcast, a homeless guy who is loved by nobody, has no friends, no means of support, and no social capital.  The novel opens when Lester (our protagonist) has his homestead sold after being taken by the county, presumably because friendless, jobless misfits have little ability to pay property taxes.  Lester then wanders into the hills to live, with no means of support and few possessions of any type.  Throughout the novel, he interacts with others, but never once does anyone treat him as anything much above subhuman. Yet, as McCarthy introduces Lester, we read:

To watch these things issuing from the otherwise mute pastoral morning is a man at the barn door.  He is small, unclean, unshaven.  He moves in the dry chaff among the dust and slats of sunlight with a constrained truculence.  Saxon and Celtic bloods.  A child of God much like yourself perhaps.

Much like yourself, indeed. 

When you think about people like Lester, what do you feel?  Do you have an obligation to love Lester?  Is it your obligation to notice Lester?  Do you have an obligation to help Lester?  Because, you see, nobody else loves or cares for Lester; nobody else is going to help Lester.  He is a child of God, much like yourself.  So, what are your obligations toward Lester?

And, by the way, Lester is a necrophiliac.  Does that change anything?

Oh, and he isn’t just a passive necrophiliac.  Sure, his first girl was dead when he found her, but after that, he created the corpses himself.  Does that change anything?

At what point does our friendless, loveless, social outcast deserve to be a friendless, loveless, social outcast?  But, before you go dismissing Lester as something beneath notice, just remember he is a child of God…much like yourself perhaps.  That sentence, which occurs on the second page of the novel, haunts the entire story. 

One part of the Reader wants to dismiss Lester as something Other, but another part of the Reader knows the Truth.  Deep down, are you really any better than Lester? Are any of us really any better than Lester?  And before you hastily answer that yes indeed you are different, ponder what entitles you to be considered a Child of God while Lester is not.

Stephen Crane could have provided the epigraph to this novel.

I stood upon a high place,
And saw, below, many devils
Running, leaping,
And carousing in sin.
One looked up, grinning,
And said, “Comrade! Brother!”

The Undesired Crossroad

Sometimes you are faced with a really lousy set of options.

Sometimes that lousy set of options is your own fault.

Cormac McCarthy’s The Counselor wrestles with exactly that problem.

A brilliant book. Just brilliant. You won’t forget it.

First though, we need to straighten one thing out.  This book is called a screenplay.  Don’t even think about watching the movie.  It’s awful.  Just read the book.  McCarthy is an amazing novelist, perhaps the greatest living writer.  He is a lousy screenwriter, a really lousy screenwriter. 

The world you live in is a world which has been made up of previous choices you have made. 

You may not have intended to create the world in which you live, but you did create it.  Once you find yourself in your current world, you will often find yourself at a crossroad, but it is not the crossroad you want. 

You want the crossroad to be whether you have to live in this world you created or not.  You want to decide whether you have to endure the consequences of your previous actions. 

But that is not the crossroad you are at.  You have no choice. 

You might give everything to avoid the consequences of your previous actions, but you cannot change your previous actions.  You are at a crossroad, but it is only the crossroad of deciding whether you will accept the fact that you have created this world you did not want or whether you refuse to accept the fact that you cannot change the world you created by your previous actions. 

But, it gets worse. 

It is not simply that you must endure the pain of knowing that the world you created is painful because of things you have done. 

You also have to make decisions now and then later on you are faced with other decisions you did not see coming at all.  You will in the future be faced with decisions you would rather not make, but you will have to make them later on because of the decisions you make now. 

But, it gets worse.  There are other people out there who are also making decisions.  And some of those people do not have the moral scruples which you have. 

And in a world in which those with moral scruples, no matter how small those scruples may be, meet those without moral scruples, the latter will win.

Like all of Cormac McCarthy’s work, this novel has a deeply moral core. 

We go through life trying to skirt the edges of being moral.  We think we can commit a small sin here or there and that it won’t really matter. 

But every time we commit those small sins, those small violations of our moral code, we create a new world in which we must live with the consequences of those past violations of our moral code.  One violation of your moral code leads to new choices and you cannot escape those new choices.  And once you are down that road, there is no going back.  Along that road you will meet people who do not have the same limits as you, and when you meet them, you will not like the results of all those previous choices you made.

And right now, you are thinking this is all a bit overblown.  You are thinking that just because you make this small decision now, you will not end up with your world destroyed.    

The hunter has a purity of heart that exists nowhere else.  I think he is not defined so much by what he has come to be as by all that he has escaped being.  You can make no distinction between what he is and what he does.  And what he does is kill.  We of course are another matter.  I suspect that we are ill-formed for the path we have chosen.  Ill-formed and ill-prepared.  We would like to draw a veil over all that blood and terror.  That have brought us to this place.  It is our faintness of heart that would close our eyes to all of that, but in doing so it makes of it our destiny.  Perhaps you would not agree.  I don’t know.  But nothing is crueler than a coward, and the slaughter to come is probably beyond our imagining.

If you think this is overblown, you have just closed your eyes. 

Don’t act surprised when you cannot undo your prior actions because you don’t like the results.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial