Courage

Define “Courage.”  

Go ahead.  Try.  Really.  What is Courage? 

I’d never given the matter much thought until I read Plato’s Laches, which is an extended discussion on the definition of Courage.  

Reading the dialogue was easily more time spent thinking about the definition of courage than I had spent in the entire rest of my life until then.  Courage is just one of those things that you know it when you see it.  I never really tried to define it. 

Having read Plato’s Dialogue on the matter, I have even less of an idea how to define it than I did before I ever tried to define it.  Plato is like that.  You don’t read Plato to Learn Something.  You read Plato to realize you Know Nothing. 

Then again, that isn’t entirely right.  I don’t really read Plato to learn how little I know.  I already know how little I know.  I, like Socrates, happily embrace my ignorance, and I, like Socrates, love nothing more than trying to figure things out even when there is no hope of actually figuring them out.  I like puzzling over things.  So, I enjoy puzzling over the definition of courage even though I don’t actually care what the definition of courage truly is. 

Indeed, the only time I ever personally encounter the idea of Courage is when I make critical remarks about Administrators at Mount Holyoke or publicly make some remark that indicates that I am to the Right of Center in politics or actually Believe my religious beliefs.  Afterwards, someone will occasionally tell me that I was really brave to say such things.  I always scoff.  I have tenure.  The Administrators cannot fire me no matter what I say.  How much courage does it take to say things when you know there is no way to lose your job?  

People who hold their ground while enemies are shooting explosives at them, people who dash out in the midst of gunfire to drag a fellow soldier to safety, people who stand up to oppressors at the risk of death, people who go into burning buildings to save others, those people have courage.  To say what I do is in any way comparable is a mockery of the term.

But, to return to Plato.  I read and enjoy Plato not because of the answer, but because it is fun to follow the meandering arguments leading nowhere. 

For example, this particular dialogue, in true Platonic fashion, doesn’t start with the discussion of courage.  It starts with trying to figure out whom one should ask for advice on a subject.  Is it the person who is skillful in the accomplishment of the matter or the person who is skillful in the means of the matter?  

Consider leadership: if you want to learn about leadership, should you consult the person who has led well or the person who has studied leadership well?  If it is the latter, then surely you want to know who the teachers were.  And do you evaluate the teachers by whether they led well or whether they studied leadership well?  At the end of the chain, it gets pretty obvious that if you want to know about leadership, you should consult leaders.  

But, do leaders know how to articulate what they know?  There is no reason to assume they do.  

If I want to study Courage, and I ask the Courageous about Courage, the will probably just say, ‘Well, my buddy was under fire and was going to die, so I went out and got him.”  That’s courage.  

The Leader would say, “Well, there was this problem and I got everyone together and we fixed the problem.”  That’s leadership.  

Is there any evidence that a study of leadership helps make leaders?  Having taught a couple of classes on the subject, I feel perfectly safe in saying that studying leadership, while fascinating to be sure, does not in any way turn someone into a leader.  You don’t have to take my word for it—many of my students said the same thing.  

The same thing is true about teaching, by the way. The best teachers did not learn their craft in Education classes.  

This is really obvious if you think about Courage. If you study Courage, will you become courageous?  Would anyone think so?  I doubt I am the least bit more courageous now that I have read Plato’s dialogue on Courage.  Indeed, I don’t even have more knowledge about Courage now that I have read this dialogue.  

Yet I have studied Courage for an hour or so.  And I am glad I did so.

Related Posts
McRaven, William Sea Stories “Remembering to the Ending of the World”
Homer The Odyssey “Odysseus: Natural Born Leader”

Leaving Lasting Art for Posterity

“If we can more and more free ourselves from values other than spiritual, I believe we are going in the right direction.”  

Anni Albers said that; Christopher Benfey repeats it in an extended…what’s the word? Meditation?  
Reflection?  Creation?…let’s just call it a Book for now.

Red Brick, Black Mountain, White Clay.  

I’d read a few reviews of this book before buying a copy; I don’t think I have ever seen a case where the reviewers so completely missed the point. 

To read the reviews, one would get the impression that this is one part Benfey’s family history, one part history of Black Mountain College, and one part discussion of pottery.  The reviews make it sound like it is a simple hodgepodge, a well-written hodgepodge to be sure, but nothing more than, at best, a wonderfully eclectic romp through history and art.

That description isn’t even close to what his book actually is.  The book is actually better described by the remark above made by Anni Albers (a 20thcentury artist well known among those who know much about such things (and Benfey’s aunt)).  

There’s an even better blurb for the book in the book itself.  A reviewer writes: “This is not a Book of Travels, properly speaking, but a series of poems, chiefly descriptive, occasioned by the Objects which the Traveler observed—It is a delicious book; & like all delicious things, you must take but a little of it at a time.”  Coleridge (yes, that Coleridge) wrote that review.  Benfey throws in the quotation in an offhand manner in a chapter about William Bartram.  Coleridge thought he was describing Bartram’s book, but I daresay that Coleridge’s description is far better used on Benfey’s book than Bartram’s. 

In the Coleridge quotation lies the real description of this book:  it is a series of poems, chiefly descriptive.  It looks like a tale of, for example, the discovery of white clay in the Carolinas or a trip to Berlin or a visit to a Japanese village known for making pottery.  But the real story here has nothing to do with the superficial.  

The book is an act of taking a lump of clay, spinning it on a wheel, firing and glazing it, turning that lump into something unexpectedly beautiful.  All the stories and side notes are just so much salt, thrown into the furnace to add an interesting texture to the life being crafted, bit by bit, story by story.

So, what is going on here?  A curious book, to put it mildly.  Joyce wrote A Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man, a novel telling about how a poet (who is, of course, Joyce) was born.  Benfey is going Joyce one better; in this book he is not telling about how the artist was born, he is creating the artist who is none other than himself.  

It reminds me of nothing so much as an old joke about baseball umpires:

First Umpire:  I call them like I see them.
Second Umpire: I call them like they are.
Third Umpire: They aren’t anything until I call them.

Traditional autobiography tries to be one of the first two umpires.  This book is the third umpire.  We are watching the author make himself here in exactly the same way we would watch a potter make a jug or a bowl or a jar.  The author is both potter and clay.  The tales of his ancestors are really just so many flicks of the wrist to add shape here or there; the historical tidbits are there to add color. 

To see it another way (which is exactly what this book does endlessly), consider an anecdote from the book.  Benfey is relating his trip to find Cherokee Clay when he finds himself talking to Jerry, the owner of the Great Smoky Mountain Fish Camp & Safari.

As we sipped long-necked bottles of beer at Jerry’s bar, he dragged out a bucket of Cherokee pottery shards.  They were brown or gray, unglazed; whatever color they retained had come from the smoke of the kiln.  Each carried a pattern of some kind, scored with a pointed tool: zigzags in parallel or an array of tight spirals, like Van Gogh’s Starry Night.  I was fingering one gray fragment in my hand like a magical talisman. “Take it,” Jerry said. “No one will ever care for it more than you do.”

One way of looking at this book is that it is a collection of those fragments.  And at times, Benfey is encouraging us to see the isolated parts here as nothing more than interesting broken shards, like a scrap from a Van Gogh painting.  But, look again and note that parts are really just fragments when they are in others’ hands; when Benfey picks up the fragment it becomes a magical talisman.  And here again, we find the secret of the book.  It looks like a fragment to you, but Benfey is using it for another, magical, purpose. 

Benfey ends the book with this:

And every once in a while, a restless genius came along—a Bartram, a Wedgewood, a Coleridge—who wandered from the familiar trail, risking falls and failures, and fused the new possibilities in unexpected ways, leaving lasting art for posterity.

Exactly so.  This book is a gigantic gamble on the future.  Will it merit rereading in a few decades?  How well do the asides and stray notes cohere when one begins to take apart the book?  Or can the book even be dissected at all?  The closest parallel to this book I have ever read is Nabokov’s Speak, Memory, but this book is much more crafted that Nabokov’s.  This book has an intentionality not only in the chapters themselves, but in the book as a whole.  So, I suppose I really can’t think of a comparison.

This is a book to be read in the same way one reads a book of poetry.  Nothing is stated directly, but as the ideas sift in memory, a pattern emerges.  I suspect, like all great poetry, as one reads it over and over, the picture takes on new hues.  Highly recommended for those who like to let their minds wander while reading.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial